Being intelligent, open minded people we listen to other people’s views and judge them against our standards of logic and kindness and modify our beliefs and attitudes if other people’s views impress us with insight, truth and humanity.
That’s a nice comfortable view of the world. It lets us feel we are good people, in charge of our decisions and actions. It’s an intuitive and almost universal view of how our minds work.
Psychologists call this concept “Folk Psychology” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_psychology .
When I read “Changing Attitudes by Changing Behavior” https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/chapter/changing-attitudes-by-changing-behavior/ I realised that unfortunately it turns out to be mostly a flattering illusion, a load of bollocks.
I read that we compose our attitudes to justify our actions. We do this to reduce the discomfort or even pain caused by cognitive dissonance. This sounds very cynical. All I can say is read the article.
The critique of folk psychology goes under the name “Eliminative Materialism”. Stop sniggering at the back.
I am going to talk about a couple of examples that show that this is far from the truth and that our attitudes, opinions and beliefs can be manipulated by using authority or social pressure to oblige us to behave in carefully designed ways.
The Welsh Not
In 1847 the great and the good, leading experts in education
published the results of an enquiry (the blue books https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treachery_of_the_Blue_Books)
into the State of Education in Wales and concluded that “the Welsh were ignorant, lazy and immoral, and
that among the causes of this were the use of the Welsh language”
In order to remove the cause of their “stupidity, sexual promiscuity
and unruly behaviour” they devised a scheme that became known as “The Welsh
Not”
http://www.Welshnot.com/about/
“The ‘not’ was given to any
child overheard speaking Welsh, who could pass it to a different child if they
were overheard speaking Welsh. By the end of the day, the wearer of the 'not' would be beaten.”
The effectiveness of this was not because of the punishment of the poor kid at the end of the day. It was in the cognitive dissonance and subsequent attitude change that occurs when a kid passes the not onto one of his peers.
At this point he can see himself in two ways.
- A victim of, and collaborator with, an unjust authoritarian system that is prepared to betray his peers to get out of a punishment
- Someone unfairly accused of speaking Welsh, who justly found a real Welsh speaker who deserved to get punished.
The discomfort felt at this point is called Cognitive
Dissonance, “the mental discomfort (psychological stress) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more
contradictory beliefs, ideas or values.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance.
It is resolved by adjusting beliefs and values to make actions already done
seem justifiable.
Actions Precede The Formation Of Values And Beliefs.
The action is dobbing in his mate. The Values and beliefs
are disdain for the Welsh language.
As well as destroying any sense of solidarity among Welsh
speaking kids, there is a subtler effect. The kid has internalised a disdain
for the Welsh language and Welsh speakers.
At that moment of betrayal, the kids feelings shift from
anxiety that they will end the day with the ‘not’, to relief that they can join
in the mocking audience of some other kid getting thrashed. They will not suffer
the indignity and pain of a public beating. Some other child will be thrashed,
some other kid will cry and be laughed at by their peers. That’s a powerful
re-enforcement of operant conditioning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_conditioning
both against the behaviour of speaking Welsh and for seeing Welsh speaking as a
fault in others.
By using authority to make a kid dob in his mate, the English instilled a hatred of the Welsh language in a generation. The kids would be receptive to the idea that Welsh was a primitive language only suitable for the lazy, ignorant and immoral.
None of these narratives play out in the kids conscious minds. Pop psychology likes to paint the subconscious as deep dark, a bit sexy, a bit mythological. Bollocks to that, our subconscious can be shallow as hell, our subconscious hides the shit we do, or think, from ourselves.
The Pronoun Game
You may have done the pronoun game, you’ve almost certainly
heard or read about it.
You’ve always supported Gay and Lesbian and Bisexual rights.
You’re in a meeting with a bunch of people you don’t know. The facilitator is a diversity expert or someone who has just been on a diversity training workshop, everyone really wants to show how nice and polite and tolerant they are. The facilitator explains how important it is that we all respect each other and that not everyone has the privilege of feeling comfortable with the gender that they were assigned at birth. So we will introduce ourselves and tell each other what gender we identify as and what our pronouns are.
The big bloke with a bit of lippy and enormous hands says “Hi I’m Sabrina, I’m a butch trans lesbian and my pronouns are she, her and hers”
You don’t want to be the awkward one, you don’t want to offend the trainer, so you find yourself saying:
“Hi, I’m called Bob, I identify as a man and my pronouns are he, him and his”
There, that wasn’t so hard. Everyone has been polite, everyone smiles, everyone is friends.
At this point you can see yourself in two ways.
- A. Someone who has been manipulated into a situation where you had to choose between social acceptance and being true to what you see and know. You bottled it and you feel like a hypocrite.
- B. Someone who is tolerant, accepts diversity and fits in. You understand the somewhat complex ideas around gender diversity. You may have work to do to actually see Sabrina as a woman, but you’re a good person, you will work on it.
If you lack a personal grudge and probably unrealistic self-belief, you might have found yourself happier to feel B.
So what has happened?
You were manipulated into doing an action ( “…and my pronouns…") that only make sense if you believe that what someone tells you of their gender identity is more important than their sex. You act as if you really believe that and are part of a tolerant rainbow alliance.
Once you have done that, you will experience cognitive
dissonance until you either kick off big time, understand how you were conned,
or adjust your attitudes and beliefs to make actions seem more congruent with your values.
The action is doing the game. The values and beliefs are the elevation of gender identity as a reality more important than sex.
Actions Precede The Formations Of Values And Beliefs.
That’s how the pronoun game works. Its genius, a masterpiece of manipulation.The action is doing the game. The values and beliefs are the elevation of gender identity as a reality more important than sex.
To break out of the manipulation we can either kick off, or we have to be honest with ourselves about why we are going along for the moment. If we are honest with ourselves we have to admit to ourselves that the people manipulating us cannot be trusted, they are either stupidly following maladaptive rituals or they have decided to coerce us. That is hard when the rest of the world is smiling.
Is there an Alternative?
How else could we share respect for each others feelings
about gender. I’m not a philosopher or
psychologist, so this is just a jumped up mechanics idea of how I would like to
discuss gender.
We could say:
- My name is Bob and I am a man.
- How am I not like other peoples expectations of my sex
- What am I not allowed to do or are afraid to do because of my sex
- How am I like other people’s expectations of my sex
- What am I allowed to do, or able to do without fear because of my sex that the opposite sex are not.
Most illuminating, thank you.
ReplyDeleteHere is a website that directly goes over the contradictions and loopholes showed in trans* discourse and presents a cohesive way of understanding gender using photos and cross-cultural examples.
ReplyDeleteIt is for the average reader and audience who is confused at the incoherence in the discussions and is definitely worth a read. We hope it could be shared around and bring some light.
genderexplained.wordpress.com
If you could, or want to if you're interested, would you use your platforms to share the work around to get it more openly known for a wider audience to visibly grasp the hyper-contradictions of the discourse that many can feel as it itches the back of their minds but have a difficulty voicing?
Approved comment, because your not trolling. This does not imply agreement.
ReplyDeleteWell there's some interesting stuff in there. But I have to say most people aren't going to get to the end.
Also I know a lot of intersex people would object to the assertion that they are not men or women. Most intersex conditions are disorders that are sex specific. Many Intersex people object to getting lumped into the trans umbrella